Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘MSA’

Why, after two and a half years of blogging, it’s practically a tradition!  Yes, it’s time for my annual post (or two or three…) about the kick-off to the Maryland School Assessment (MSA) prep season.  And this year brings a stunner.  You can read for yourself:

Eastern Families,

I am very excited to share that beginning Tuesday, January 26, 2010 Eastern will implement a minor schedule modification. This modification is the addition of a daily 27 minute MSA practice session. This session will occur between 2nd and 3rd period each day. In order to dedicate this time each of the seven periods will be shortened from 49 to 45 minutes. We will return the original schedule at the conclusion of the MSA (March 22, 2010) .

The MSA practice time we be used as follows:
1 day each week of testing strategies.
2 days each week focused on the reading standards.
2 days each week focused on the math standards.

The MSA practice groupings were formed based on the students predicted MSA performance. Each group has been assigned a minimum of two staff coaches. Almost every adult in the building including teachers, counselors, administrators, secretaries, and building services staff have committed to working with students during this MSA practice time.

Eastern Middle School has administered two MSA practice tests (October and December). The data from the practices was analyzed to determine areas in need of additional support for each English class and each Math class. The MSA practice time will be used to provide structured practice on those cotent indicators that our students showed as areas in need of improvement.

Some of you may ask… my child is in advanced classes and does not need MSA prep — why do they have to do this? First, this is a whole-school initiative. Offering this preparation opportunity for some students and not for all conflicts with our philosophy that we are one school that provides equitable opportunities for all students. Second, the MSA focuses on grade level content. Our advanced students are working beyond their grade level and may have not practiced the tested skills for quite a while. All students will benefit from the structured content review — particularly in math.

Thank you in advance for your support of this MSA preparation plan.
Please feel free to contact me directly via email or 301-650-6650 if you have any questions or concerns.

(name removed)
Proud Principal

Predictably–and justifiably, in my opinion–there have been howls of protest on the school’s listservs.  As one parent commented “lumping all magnet students (for the purposes of a “whole-school” approach) into what is essentially remedial instruction for six weeks is completely inappropriate – and yet another symptom of what is going wrong with this program and this school.”  Others chimed in that this much test prep is inappropriate for any child who is solidly “proficient” or “advanced.”  Yet another posited that her child would get more benefit from an additional 27 minutes of sleep a day.

Bottom line:  You can wrap it in all the “excited” and “opportunity” and “proud principal” you like, but it’s still a perfect illustration of the misguided, “one size fits all” approach on which MCPS is hell bent. Yikes.  And sorry to go all “red zone” on you again, but I would guess that kids in Potomac aren’t losing 11 hours of instructional time in the coming weeks to prep for the MSAs (or are they??).

The principal responded…and just seemed to dig herself in deeper.

I do not disagree with any of the points that were made in these emails. The amount of energy and time that is dedicated to one single assessment – the MSA – can be extremely frustrating. It is the current state of public education in the US as mandated by NCLB that each state implement this type of test. The performance targets for these tests increase each year.

As you know, Eastern MS did not meet the targets for the 2009 MSA. It is my charge as principal to ensure that our instructional programs and MSA preparation and planning were reveiwed [sic] and modified in a effort to meet the 2010 targets. While some may feel that our the test preparations initiatives are not necessary for thier [sic] child I beleive [sic] that a whole school approach is appropriate for Eastern Middle School.  The groupings and instructional strategies have been differentiated based on predicted MSA score and every effort will be made to make the time meaningful for every student.

I recognize that using any time for anything other than instruction may not be a desired state, however, there are activities, events, and opportunities that arise that require use of class time. These include guest speakers, field trips, required testing, and in this case MSA preparation.

There are students, humanities nad [sic] comprehensive, that have demonstrated advanced level academic ability. This being said I repeat that I beleive [sic] that a schoolwide MSA prep initiative is appropriate for EMS.  Again, we are committed to making this MSA prep time beneficial for all. I ask this of you and your students…. give us two weeks to implement this plan. We will monitor the effectiveness carefully. If there is evidence after this two weeks that a test prep group has demonstrated advanced level abilities on the prep items then we will consider alternative use of this time for these students. Evidence will include performance data and student feedback.

A PTSA meeting is scheduled for Feb. 2.

Read Full Post »

Yes, it’s that time of the year, the time when the MSA results are announced.  Not surprisingly, it was front page news in the Washington Post this morning.

Md. Scores In Reading, Math Show Big Strides the headline blares.

But let’s take a closer look.

Montgomery County continued to fare strongly in most categories, although 12 of the county’s 38 middle schools failed to make “adequate yearly progress,” a yardstick under the federal No Child Left Behind law that is used to measure schools in a variety of ways….

At several other Montgomery middle schools, the scores of Hispanic students or others with limited English proficiency failed to show adequate yearly progress.

“12 of the county’s 38 middle schools failed to make “adequate yearly progress.”  That’s give or take one third of MCPS middle schools!  Here’s the MCPS press release spin on things.  Instead of their pokey .pdf link, use this handy dandy link to the 2009 Maryland Report Card, where you can break things down every which way.

To keep in mind: a quote from last year’s obligatory MSA story

“Fact number one is that Maryland sets the bar defining proficiency very close to the ground,” said Bruce Fuller, a professor of education and public policy at the University of California at Berkeley. “State officials are under enormous political pressure to show progress.” Fuller added, however, that the upward trajectory on both the national and state tests suggests “that kids in Maryland are learning more over the course of the year now than they were in the 1990s.”

A better measure of how Maryland is doing?  The NAEP or National Assessment of Educational Progress (wikipedia).  For comparison sake, take a look at 2007 8th grade reading, just to choose an example.

  • On the 2007 NAEP, Maryland had 3% advanced, 30% proficient, 42% basic, 24% below basic.
  • On the 2007 MSA, 23.9% advanced, 44.3 % proficient, 31.7% basic.

Hmm.  Something appears to be out of whack.  Meanwhile, over at the Baltimore Sun, Lisa Bowle asks “Is advanced the new proficient?” Answer:  yes.  Look no further than the  MCPS Seven Keys to College Readiness hoopla.  Check it out. According to MCPS, a student should be “advanced” on the MSA reading in grades 3-8 in order to be “college and work ready” (the latest edu-buzz phrase); in other words, not need remediation in college.  So are the MSAs a meaningless exercise?  As they stand now, yes.

Read Full Post »

I suppose I should be shocked speechless, but after several years of paying particular attention to gifted education in MCPS, not much shocks me anymore.  Still, to have it all laid out so clearly and succinctly by a new-to-the-beat writer on a nationally read education blog was, well, startling.

I speak of back-to-back posts today by Mary Ann Zehr over on Curriculum Matters, one of EducationWeek.org’ s blogs.  Zehr recently attended a seminar on “detracking” and wrote about it in her post, The Problem of Tracking in Middle Schools.  When a panel was asked how to end tracking (“apartheid”)

Kati Haycock, the president of the Education Trust, replied that combating tracking, where students are placed in classes according to their level of academic performance, “is about calling it malpractice and acting on it.”

Deep breath.  We’ve all heard this before from MCEF.

Zehr then shares the anecdote of another panelist, an MCPS middle school assistant principal.

…her school made a move to reduce tracking in English-language arts classes. The school decided to do away with a remedial class in English-language arts for the lowest performing students, and mix the students from that class in with students from two other classes of gifted and talented students. So the school blended the lowest-performing and highest-performing students in classes to learn English-language arts together. She said that each class was then taught by a team of two teachers. In one of the classes, one of the teachers who was part of the team was a special education teacher. Kopnitsky said that test scores show that the change benefited the students who had been in the remedial class.

Left unasked, of course, is the $60,000 question:  What of the impact on the high performing students? (For the moment we’ll table the question of how many MCPS middle schools allocate *two* teachers per class to ensure differentiation.)

Zehr quickly realized this, and followed up with another post two hours later:  Tracking Is a Hot-Button Issue—Follow-Up to Recent Post

I just called Stacey A. Kopnitsky, the assistant principal at Cabin John Middle School, to ask her what happened to the performance of the gifted and talented students at her school after they were mixed in English-language arts classes with the low-performing students.She says that those students scored “advanced,” the highest of three levels, on the Maryland state English-language-arts test both before and after the change in policy. “They were maintaining and doing as well as before,” she said.

But she also acknowledged that the teachers and administrators in the school didn’t look at the test-score data in any more detail than to make sure that the top-performing students were staying within the advanced level. She said they were more focused on the progress of the students with basic skills.

Okay, so those advanced students were… “maintaining.”  Yeah, read that again.  “They were maintaining and doing as well as before.” On the grade-level MSA.  And that second paragraph…read that one again.  No, read it three times–especially the last sentence:   “She said they were more focused on the progress of the students with basic skills.”

See?  I haven’t been making this stuff up.  And the kicker?

Kopnitsky added that no parents have complained about the policy change.

Did the parents even have a clue??

Welcome to the neighborhood, Mary Ann.

Read Full Post »

Yes, it’s MSA silly season again.  That time of the school year where the entire focus of the school becomes preparing for the Maryland School Assessments.

  • Two weeks ago a friend with a child in one of the elementary immersion programs wrote me that her child’s class — third graders about to do their first MSA — will spend an entire month practicing for the test, with absolutely no regular reading/science/social studies done during that time.  She confirmed this with the teacher.  Now it’s true that these kids have had the entire curriculum so far in a foreign language, so it makes sense that they would need to review the English names for things and some English vocabulary.  But an entire month? My friend finds this “appalling — not a GT issue, per se, but an issue for all the kids.”
  • The child of another friend came home and reported that her class was ushered into a classroom and told that if they did not do really well on the MSA  they would be relegated to double periods of math and reading in 6th grade and would not have any electives.  Um, totally not true.

And of course there are the MSA pep rallies and incentives like iPod shuffles.  What’s happening at your school?

Read Full Post »

Last week I waded further into school advocacy waters by sitting in on the first meeting of the SIT at M.’s school.

Translation? SIT = School Improvement Team. The SIT is charged with developing a SIP for the school. SIP = School Improvement Plan. In MCPS, every school develops one. It’s all part of the monstrous, soul-sucking Baldridge Plan hoo-ha that MCPS adopted several years ago. Data and benchmarks and “stakeholders” and “mission statements” and databinders for second-graders (shudder).

Anyway, the PTA president asked me if I would join her at the meeting. I was going to blow it off (how many working parents can get to a school meeting at 4 in the afternoon from downtown?) but at the last minute I decided to shuffle my schedule and leave work early. I walked past the classroom where the meeting was to take place and at first was confused. A rather intense meeting was already under way. Had I missed the SIT? Evidently not. The PTA president showed up and promptly at 4 the door opened. Seems that was a “Leadership Team Meeting” with key staff members.

We walked in and I snagged a desk/chair near the door so that I would be able to slink out promptly at 5. ( I had to join a conference call via cell phone for work.) There were maybe 20 people the room, of whom I recognized two: the principal and the 6th grade counselor. They widened the circle so everyone could fit and we, the two lone parents, were invited to introduce ourselves.

Up on the Promethean board (yay expensive technology!) the schematic for the 2008-2009 SIP was projected. It was completely unreadable from the distance I and many others were sitting. What’s more, this was the 2008-2009 draft–and neither I nor my PTA friend had ever seen it before, much less had a copy in hand. [Note: Much to its credit, at least this school has its 2007-2008 SIP on its website. I just checked the websites of 4 MPCS middle schools...*none* had it posted. So much for parent involvement, transparency, accountability...all those things Baldridge is supposed to be about.] The principal proceeded to walk through the elements of the schematic: goals, leadership, stakeholders, performance results. There was lots of jargon, much of it mind-numbing, and I admit my attention started to wander. What it fixed on instead was the new book sitting on the desk of every staff member in the room: Courageous Conversations about Race: A Field Guide for Achieving Equity in Schools.

With about 30 minutes left of our allotted hour, the principal broke everyone into small groups and doled out the goals. There was school climate, and special ed and rigor and… rigor…that’s where I went. It was just me and the–surprise!– Literacy Coach. The very same one who had advocated such an atypically out of the box solution for M. and been politely rebuffed.

So, on to the goals. Goal 1: Meet the goal of rigor by increasing the numbers of kids taking advanced/GT classes. I cut right to the chase. The first measure I told her is, in my humble opinion, meaningless. The school can stuff as many kids as it wants into a “GT” class to meet the directives set from on high (to the point that it becomes a heterogeneous class) but it tells me absolutely nothing about what happens *in* that class.

Goal 2: Increase the number of kids who score “advanced” on the MSA, the state assessment. All well and good, I told her, but meaningless for the significant (and diverse) number of students who come into the school already scoring “advanced.” As written, the goal focuses institutional attention and resources solely on low-performing students. There is no obligation to move the already advanced students a commensurate amount. And, I added, we all know that the MSA is a weak and watered down measure of achievement.

The Literacy Coach took it all in and asked me to write my comments on stickies.

We never got to Goal 3, which I think was something about increasing the number of students on the honor roll. I had to leave promptly at 5 and the meeting ran over so regrettably I wasn’t able to see the reaction when our group reported out. I’ll learn more at the next meeting.

Interestingly, the SIT/SIP process has recently been the topic of some conversation on the GT listservs. It’s being touted as one of the few ways parents can speak up for enriched and accelerated instruction. I have to say though, after going home and flipping through that book on Amazon, I don’t feel that my parental input is exactly the kind they have in mind.

Read Full Post »

Two years have passed since the start of a series of events that culminated in C. leaving school in the middle of 7th grade to homeschool. I’ve alluded to it. It’s been the elephant in the room. Well, I think I’m finally going to try to write about it. So here goes.

Our family and C. entered 6th grade with high hopes. She was coming off of two difficult years: 4th grade in a Center program, and a really awful 5th grade year in “normal” school. I was convinced that the main “issue” was a poor educational fit–namely lack of challenge and intellectual peers. During that 5th grade year some urged us to apply to private schools for middle school. But regardless of the path we chose (and we couldn’t afford private), we needed some answers to help us figure out what was going on with this child, how to go forward, how to navigate into middle school and beyond. So at the very end of 5th grade we took C. to Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth Diagnostic and Counseling Center for a two-day evaluation. The results came back mid-summer: not only was she “gifted,” she was “profoundly gifted” (a term, btw, that it took me a loooong time to come to terms with). It was immensely gratifying–finally–to “own” the data, and to have the opinion of neutral, highly respected outside experts. It was wonderful to feel supported, to be directed to additional resources.

We felt very optimistic about the coming school year. C. was entering one of our county’s vaunted magnet programs, the ones we had been hearing about since preschool. Finally, we thought, she’ll find a proper educational fit. She’ll have peers. The program even focused on her strength area.

To help things start off on the right foot we followed the suggestion of CTY and–before school even started–sent the CTY report to the magnet coordinator with a cover letter explaining what had led us to do the testing and expressing our optimism for the coming school year. When C. was accepted into the Davidson Young Scholars program, we passed that information on to the school.  Also on CTY’s recommendation, we began seeing a counselor to help deal with the transition into middle school. C. and I went for several sessions through the fall, but by Christmas she decided didn’t want to go anymore and I agreed. Things were going very well. C. was happy. She had become friends with a nice group of girls. She got involved in drama–a wonderful outlet–and Girl Scouts. Her grades were excellent. I didn’t see the point.

The only “blip” was in February, when the mind-numbing prep started for the MSA. Like clockwork I started to hear the complaining, the “I don’t like school” statements, especially about English. C. found the test prep stupid and frustrating. (For my party, I wondered why these kids who had been tested to within an inch of their lives to get in and were clearly the best of the best, had to undergo any prep for this on-level state test.)

Vigilant because of our 5th grade experience, I sent an e-mail to the English teacher to “check in.” In her reply she said she was “surprised” by my e-mail. According to her, C. was doing well both academically and socially. A few days later I contacted the school counselor and shared my concerns with her as well, and asked if she could very casually check in with C.’s other teachers. The following month we spoke on the phone and exchanged e-mails. In the intervening weeks she had talked to teachers and done some casual observation. I wrote to her that I was “glad to hear that according to her teachers things seem to be fine with C. at school.” With each of these exchanges–the teacher and the counselor–I referenced the CTY report and suggested they follow up with the magnet coordinator, who had a copy.

I decribed it as a “good” year. “Any year that I don’t have to talk to the school,” I would say half in jest, “is a ‘good’ year.” (I would later modify that assessment somewhat. It turns out C. had spent countless hours throughout the school year researching boarding schools and private schools.)

So as C. entered 7th grade I envisioned smooth sailing, more of the same. Things were so good, in fact, that at the start of the school year I actually contemplated looking for a full-time job. Little did I know how quickly things could change.

It started with science class. In 6th grade, science had been–surprisingly–her favorite class, a testament to the teacher, who was inventive, engaging and charismatic. Seventh grade was different. Partially it was that this teacher simply wasn’t last year’s teacher…and the contrast was jarring. Partially it was the material, which according to C. was just more of the same. And partially it was the class itself. There were close to 35 students in the class. It was supposed to be GT but it wasn’t operating at that level, thanks to the push to advance marginal kids. Group work was an exercise in frustration. And C. was bored. She would do her work, which largely consisted of exercises from the book, and just sit. Or read.

The reading did her in. As bad luck would have it, on a single day she was reprimanded in English for reading when she wasn’t supposed to, and later the same day reprimanded in front of the class by the science teacher for “sneak reading.” The science teacher told C. that she had heard of her earlier infraction from the English teacher. That was that. C. was outraged that they were discussing her.

I took what I thought was an even approach. I talked about how we all have to adjust to new situations, new teachers, different ways of doing things. I counseled her to give it a chance. I wanted her to find a way to work it out. But the complaints persisted. Finally, I called the program coordinator, asking for some advice on how to approach the situation. Predictably, she suggested I wait and see and then talk to the teacher.

I guess I’m a wuss. I have always found it very difficult to talk to a teacher in these kinds of situations. As a parent, you are never operating from a position of strength. You are one step removed from the situation because you’re not in the classroom. You can’t possibly know what’s happening there. You just see the symptoms and of course you’re biased. Meanwhile the teacher is there, and what’s more, “the expert.” He/she is the adult. The child is the malleable object. So who has the power here? It would be the rare teacher who upon hearing “Hi, my daughter seems to be really unhappy in your class” would express sympathy and strive to see it from the child’s perspective, who would think that perhaps something he/she was/wasn’t doing could be the cause. No, the typical response is defensive, to say “Really? Well, X. does seem to have trouble with X. and that’s because he/she needs to X…. He/she needs to be more X….”

The discontent spread.

Two days after that call I sent the program coordinator an e-mail.

You may recall that I spoke with you the other day seeking advice about my daughter and her frustrations with science class. In general I try to let her work things out over time, because those things happen and are part of school and work life. But I just wanted to let you know that I just spent 10 minutes this morning in front of the school persuading my daughter to go inside. She didn’t want to go to school. Over the past few days she has been upset about her interactions with (two other teachers) and feels that they “don’t like me.” When her distress extends to not wanting to go to school, and multiple teachers, I begin to become concerned. Could you please let me know what advice you have for such a situation?

It was the third week of September.

Her reply was that if I didn’t think it was a temporary issue, I should contact the team leader and an arrange a “team meeting.” She and the school counselor would also be in attendance.

Two days later I reported that the feelings were intensifying and contacted the team leader to schedule a meeting in an effort to find ways to keep C. school positive. Two days after that I got a response. They could schedule an emergency meeting, but the coordinator would be absent due to a school function, or we could wait a week. I decided to hold off. C. wasn’t across the board school averse. There were other classes she loved. It was half her schedule, in other words every other day.

Things were building. Around this time she learned that she didn’t get a role in school play after two roles in 6th grade. She took it hard. Why? she asked again and again. The seeming randomness nagged her. For a few days she lost her all-important agenda and thus wasn’t able to produce a “pass” in order to meet with a teacher for a conference for her research paper. She did poorly on a quiz, was reprimanded for reading, felt condescended to. To an adult no one thing would seem to be very significant, but for a 7th grader, taken together and sprinkled with a few hormones, it congealed into a huge ball of badness. C. started calling me after school, tears in her voice, and asking me to pick her up from school, rather than ride the bus. There was also stress at home. Longtime renters, we were being forced to move, and I was having a very hard time coming to terms with the situation. Typical of highly gifted kids, of kids with those sensitivities and overexcitabilities, she absorbed my stress and sadness like a sponge…

(To be continued.)

Read Full Post »

Another rawking good post by Tamara Fisher at “Unwrapping the Gifted” entitled Advanced Readers. (God, I love that woman. The fact that she’s a teacher and saying what says just means the world to me.) I hadn’t even finished it when I jumped down and starting pounding away in her comments box, but then thought, geez, I’m getting a little worked up in her space. This isn’t a comment, it’s a blog post. So here goes.

She writes:

For kids at the 90th percentile, there is consistent WCPM [words correct per minute] growth until middle school, where they don’t stagnate, they actually regress. Our most talented readers and they’re regressing‽‽‽

This is educational neglect, folks.

We have a nation-wide lack of adequate, ability-appropriate educational growth for a sizeable number of capable students and it seems no one is screaming about it!

Yes, Yes, Yes!

As the mom of a profoundly verbally gifted child, I have been talking about this to anyone who will listen. Just to this issue of regression, our personal experience. Here in MCPS they introduced the MAP-R four or so years ago. It’s a computer-based assessment tool, done either two or three times per year, depending on grade. It’s used as a diagnostic tool. The students work through a series of exercises that get harder or easier depending on how they answer, allowing the test to pinpoint exactly where the child is on several measures. Because of the high ceiling it can be especially useful in assessing the abilities of highly able younger students. The results are available to the teacher almost immediately and it’s being used systemwide to target with laser-like precision those students who are “on the bubble” for NCLB and require extra intervention.

But *all* students take the test. C. took it for the first time in 5th grade, when it was introduced, in 6th and in 7th. In the fall of 5th grade she was already at what the reading specialist told me was 12th grade-plus equivalency. When she was retested in the spring, she actually *dropped*. As in negative growth. Regression. At the beginning of 6th grade she tested again and had recovered and improved slightly on her fall 5th grade score…and then dropped in the spring. Same deal in 7th. (I could, I suppose, make the case that school was actually *harming* her learning.)

And at any time did anyone say, “Hey, this kid is reading 7 grades above level, and what’s more, she’s regressing while she’s in school, only to recover over the summer?” Uh, no. In 5th grade they just gave her the standard 5th grade GT “program,” namely the William and Mary Secret Garden unit (which she had read–and watched, in play and movie format numerous times–years previous). She was still expected to read and complete the exercises for Time For Kids (a bowdlerized Time Magazine) like everyone else. If this isn’t “educational neglect” I don’t know what is. It’s this example and others, that get me incensed, that fuel my passion, that prompted me to start this blog (check out my tags for other posts on being verbally gifted).

Anyway, last year on our local GT listserv there was extensive discussion about coming up with a recommendation for the powers that be of a “datapoint” that could be used to track achievement in Reading/Language Arts that would be comparable to the “algebra by 8th grade” datapoint. “Aha,” I thought, “The MAP-R!” But that idea went nowhere. Evidently the powers that be said that there would be no way to show that the progress was achieved by input from teaching rather than advantages in the home. One parent was told by a teacher at her middle school that they take MAP-R with a huge grain of salt because “kids figure out how to get high scores.”

Okay, so you’re going to be a data-driven system, and take the data as gospel when it applies to underperforming students…but ignore it when it applies to students who are high achieving and possibly reaching the ceiling of your measures? Teaching matters for underperforming students, but not with high achieving students? Oh, that’s right. They come with all these home advantages anyway (GT students are all white and middle class, no?), so in their case test results are meaningless. This logic–or lack thereof–took my breath away. And still does.

I recently had reason to take a look at the MCPS Strategic Plan. What a bunch of soulless, bureacratic, educratic gobbledy-gook. But while the system says it wants to provide a world class education for every student, take a look at the performance targets. For middle school they’re shooting for roughly 75% “at or above proficient” on the low standard Maryland State Assessment. Where in that is there any incentive whatsoever to recognize the students who already are above proficient and move them further? Tamara says it well:

If we don’t have time to reach every child where he or she is and move them on from there – if we don’t have time to challenge every kid at his or her learning readiness level – if we only focus on the kids who “need to get there,” – then we are deciding that some kids will not get an education that year. We are deciding that some kids will get to learn, thanks to our efforts, and others will be denied their potential degree of educational growth, thanks to our lack of effort. We’re deciding this based on proficiency of “grade level,” not based on what is actually appropriate academic growth for a given learner. Individual student growth – actual LEARNING – is an irrelevant factor apparently. All that matters, it would seem, is that they reach the bar. And if they’re already at the bar, then it’s okay to not put any effort into teaching them.

Yes, I am actually saying that when we say we don’t have time to work with the advanced learners in our classes, we are in essence saying that we are choosing to not give those kids an education.

Thank you, Tamara for saying this. More of us need to say it, louder and to wider audiences.

Read Full Post »

“Fact number one is that Maryland sets the bar defining proficiency very close to the ground,” said Bruce Fuller, a professor of education and public policy at the University of California at Berkeley. “State officials are under enormous political pressure to show progress.”

That from this morning’s story in the Washington Post, “Md. Scores In Reading, Math Show Big Strides.”

Here’s the link to the 2007 Maryland Report Card.

Number crunchers, go wild!

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.